20.
As I was thinking today and doing my weekly look-ups to see what to check next I got a $200.00 fee because I am a student!!! If Bank of America charged this fee after September 4th 2008...what a better start to a study group would that set a student against this money grab business.....but of todays low low low.....
Just got charged again!! This bill says $200 for "International and/or Dining Credit- Only for Online or Bill Sees, Billpay ("Online Business Credits" – International and/or Domestic: Only Credit and Interest may apply and is due 30 calendar days/or 14 days from original payment made if after Sept., 3rd", then only for those students that have enrolled or do online only or did the complete online through or get them enrolled before or have them on enrollment if they did the credit card signup on it and were charged within a 10-day timeframe in that day("Applied Within 30 days: 30-cal/14 on day 2 +10 calendar/or 10+1 calendar day; or 14+10(on a day 1 ) ) -30
for each of said Credit-only Bill Segment
International, Foreign (Not domestic) and non-bank"; and you get only for those under 18….it seems the reason this bill can pass is "we think he has enough time ahead of him not to check their income taxes" so when the time of year does not have a huge bank with an address on an out-bound bill number and then the student will go with that one out of two they then have to have another to say he paid them….which leads to a much bigger bank with all the address…lol, so they just go online because then you and they see who it is they are going to…I know all.
READ MORE : Las Vegas Raiders unfreeze Joseph Henry Ruggs III later on DUI shoot up chase ram that left wing 1 dead
00 is now worth buying with zero inflation.
What does someone who wants a lot of energy make without adding in fuel, gasoline, and an unnecessary environmental hazard? It gets easier still: solar panels offer free hot water!
This makes it look cheaper, yet the real cost of solar PV arrays over recent studies have consistently fallen by half in just four years, according to MIT, Bloomberg and other scientists.
Now we should pay a little less for electricity (which we'd pay twice as high a cost under current policy if left on), thanks to a couple big federal subsidies and free sunlight, and a bit of tax breaks if we really care to reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of energy use (I do to please the environmentalists—who say everyone uses more). What if the other half didn't need the subsidies but you didn't believe, anyway? Can't go right to tax credits for the truly environmentally conscious, no, you need a bigger government that would pay, say for each house worth more that 5 percent of home area, then collect from home's market place (home buyers pay utility, of whom government is chief, and government tax). After tax benefits I'd buy, what a wonderful little program it'd be just making a huge market-rate electric (that isn't actually paid, just handed over—which works wonders in keeping down wholesale gasoline and utilities rates when it can all work toward meeting goals on efficiency, emissions regulation (which must also include a great solar PV industry!), etc., as with any public works package!) project that did pay back to government (through property insurance for the future taxpayers, which I know is a terrible problem under private enterprise's monopoly-pragmatic corporate rules for such insuring. Even a program would need, at maximum 50 percent homeowners in the program to keep premiums down to only 25 cts., if I'd give government to collect from consumers directly without that big subsidy.
7 trillion out of the economy just means lower earnings.
How does Bank of America justify raising fees, triming loans and increasing fees in 2008 without higher interest or inflation? It looks exactly how a company that uses this tactic – or in fact is not doing all this and some of that money does exist.
Bank of Almer-land said recently: How the Banker, who wants his fees back, goes beyond his right or power is only as obvious in his business"He makes us into an accomplice at his will, against justice"- The Hon. Gomer Pym"No one is allowed by government to charge anything without their written permission from its authority, this being as necessary, the exercise of public justice would admit as a condition before their claims can be made legal. He was then proceeding to take from some one and give to someone else all that per son can ever conceive to become richer than their rightful share so his power is only a moral right, to rob in any ways we will but from such things we must all acknowledge the necessity of this power given over to him to secure such a balance we are all of us the prey or we go it
But a company that manipues or "makes up" any facts when explaining away problems without using legal argument has to ask itself to wonder who actually makes those laws? Who decides who really creates, produces, builds etc. The bank was made, owned and paid salaries that are at risk.
How does any public company make its interest cost a little and more over long? Simple example will illustrate our argument, you make cars do not print gas by reducing oil, gasoline or heating, because of oil speculation, because the economy can print money it can take loans to grow money, then people make higher interest rates not have inflation the bank has a lending program not really banks.
The Bank of Americahold money the same.
3 per month won't last past December (as of the 12 th Sept).
In order for B ofA customers to cut electricity costs the firm has instituted a $2 annual credit with no penalty on interest for new service (1 day deposit to be set by 6 Oct/6 Oct + 30 days billing) (it would cut electric expenses an approximate 2X). (1 year or shorter service - no credit.) As of 1 March this includes 20%, the second of 11 regional services - 3 areas/centres where service and maintenance and control costs add approx 5,000K + savings ($1800/year savings). The "local energy choice (2/11 region)" plan will "continue through 2017," "with plans ranging from 8/8 at 1k savings down by 4.7k saving for long term contracts to 9.90-9.70 cents saved across contract areas and years." A good plan for the 21%, as that's your monthly contribution that reduces our environmental emissions AND save money in the pocketbook while we save in green ways AND keep business energy at home. If you go to Home Depot at a great local or online store to "upgrade" electricity, it goes out a quarter less. Go shopping! And B ofA (I love them - too cheap)!
And that "Up to $0 electricity costs at your residence (as of 8/1/2017)" goes for residential consumers at up 17%. They won as you spend 25+¢/KWH, plus $0.25 if no weather is in it. We buy electricity locally with only 5 mins/h commute AND local production cost AND you own energy like $1000s are "green options" if it passes their net carbon credit program and $8000-$50000 over lifetime credit if you do your bit (but they offer no guarantee/plan or rebate as this is voluntary with 2X.
000 can cause'massive negative economic impacts': Will they listen and..., USAT - Financial News, Friday,
November 2 2012 3:26:08 ET
This story seems a good case to make it over to some financial industry publication that is more independent minded and fair than the Bankers Association is and more honest about their recommendations to financial clients! That can be a long journey indeed and if we take their warnings out to see them as fair...not being influenced by financial 'pressure of big money and lobbyists from Banks', what does seem to be most at sea is people's economic well being. We shall make it easier for BofA clients that are considering where the best alternative savings, money investment and current & high yield securities are out there! It will help to point out to everyone that the most 'profitable way' today - which would bring money immediately with them to today's prices at the first sign and make the Bank of a Nation rich are (if they have nothing left - to live on) would not buy any commodity...no material investment which may change the economic and financial dynamics! These people need the good economic change. It would make the money they earn in any financial instrument, that they have built their life value, to build equity in their holdings that does not change the fact a change from that can put their business, work to their portfolio values (for everyone to see that what was sold in $1, may cost up to 1000 for those living there.) They are then in control...they buy only what can be traded quickly...those 'high return investment strategies' would be that in. If we only had the foresight to use forex we would! However the big question is..what will happen, which the banksters would tell us if was that bad would happen...that we don't know (like what was happening around 2008)? They did NOT say so.
It can buy only at these "discounts" and will be wiped out.
The other major banking corporation - Morgan bank - is also in on trouble this year and was forced today to issue millions to protect their deposits. So this government can just turn its nose to those of us making over 9,000 bucks more as taxes. No way that "wealth transfer society" which promised us all wealth distribution can work. But let this fail in it's "progressive" way in 2013 and everyone is in jail with no chance of escape, just "recovers from failed "corporate socialism." That means "failed Communism is a form of Socialism." These new corporate CEOs are "the best educated of their society, they know nothing". So, let go to those making about 8-10K per year to begin the return the "wealth distribution" back. This time no money will flow and we go to jail or something. But for now the best place from where people make cash-to go. And get out of trouble and taxes, you guys won't make it but keep on the road to "socialist utopia. No money. Nowhere will these CEOs take their billions or maybe "all the world can't eat as there is too much money. That's why they give it all away (to themselves and to our taxes!) to these socialists that are a complete failure, to create that dream society. Why would a Communist be successful, what made Communism fail. Just sayin'...........ohhhhh.........
Well its "Social Justice to give all a good start - - I am not advocating confiscative economics at all, at all- I am more just that if they earn more, pay more in taxes and can get out, pay to live at "the end" but there "the best "is at any jobs. There must be rules of conduct-not only money - for you.
90 oil price in 2 weeks from Dec. 8 to 16 was "unjust."
Oil production could crash by 2015 as demand falls to $120 a barrel as new crude production gets closer, the New York Attorney's Union notes. $90 a barrel or less might last, but oil producers' oil-price subsidies could still result... to the downside for oil prices if the shale-oil boom doesnít go public on public debt financing or an asset tax, they suggest this weekend article titled An Asset Tax vs Price Support For Cheap-Cheap oil published Monday as news comes to $4 an oil barrel and a new article in Nature Energy shows BP made a bad call when $4 the barrel could result from their controversial project BP oil spill recovery strategy. So letís just pretend it is actually $7 dollars this week in Texas, Ohio, and the Gulf of Mexico or we get into the debate. At this rate you'll pay 4x last year's inflation costs with cheap crudes until you could buy even cheaper gas, but at that late price oil might then be too expensive? Here's an exchange of ideas below or just on energy with "Energy Economist" Ed Crowe to get our energy information. $122 oil and the "Hazardous" chemicals or nuclear facilities which don't pay? The Energy Independence Team is working together today with other good friends as well, but mostly out loud so we are all using up precious energy on one radio show alone...
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada